Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Kurumi Nara vs Tena Lukas Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nara vs Lukas analysis and find out who is favored!
Kurumi Nara vs Tena Lukas Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nara 1 - 0 Lukas
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nara has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Lukas has won 40.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nara, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Lukas has won 58.52%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 44.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nara has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lukas has saved 49.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nara has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Lukas winning 60.53% (W/L 46/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nara has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 247/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 22/ 30). Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 387/ 242), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nara winning 1 times and Lukas being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nara winning 2 and Lukas winning 0. The last match between Nara and Lukas was at the W60 Olomouc, 21-07-2022, Third, Clay with Kurumi Nara getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:4:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nara and Lukas have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nara winning 0 times and Lukas 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nara winning 1, and Lukas 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nara has played against opponents with an average rank of while Lukas has played against players with an average rank of 257.68.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nara has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lukas has won 59% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nara has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lukas has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
246
Rank
32
High
32
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
225
Rank
200
High
29
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
55% (394-324)
Career Total W/L
58% (425-312)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (18-14)
$1,683,681
Career Prize Money
$31,490
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Kurumi Nara vs Tena Lukas For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nara VS Lukas
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Kurumi Nara | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:4:0 | 2:4:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (47/83) | 61% (48/79) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (27/47) | 46% (22/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 36% (13/36) | 35% (11/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (46/79) | 52% (43/83) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Kurumi Nara
Player
Tena Lukas
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
52%
(
43 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Kurumi Nara | Tena Lukas |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 55% (43/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (355/342) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (18/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 72 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.63 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 212 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:47:43 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 245.66 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 59% (1369/2325) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 59% (802/1369) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (388/956) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 53% (170/323) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 49% (1126/2294) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (18/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (18/32) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (18/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (18/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 29% (14/4) |
Kurumi Nara Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Shinikova
Player
Kurumi Nara
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
0-6 7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Nicole Melichar
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Coco Vandeweghe
Player
Kurumi Nara
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Priscilla Hon
Player
Kurumi Nara
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Bianca Jolie Fernandez
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
69%
(
62 of
90)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Angelica Moratelli
Player
Kurumi Nara
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
72%
(
72 of
100)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
3
44%
(
20 of
45)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
100%
(
8 of
8)
57%
(
40 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
57 of
100)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
24 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sara Bejlek
Player
Kurumi Nara
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Tena Lukas
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
9
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
36%
(
13 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
52%
(
43 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Victoria Kan
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
36%
(
21 of
59)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
74
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lia Karatancheva
Player
Tena Lukas
59%
(
48 of
82)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
9
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Tena Lukas
53%
(
38 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
72
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Alexandra Eala
58%
(
80 of
139)
1st Serve %
68%
(
68 of
100)
8
Aces
1
21
Double Faults
4
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
29%
(
17 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
69 of
139)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
121
Total Points Won
118
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiya Soboleva
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
70 of
92)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
89)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
50%
(
35 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
53%
(
49 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
89)
93
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
82 of
125)
1st Serve %
80%
(
79 of
99)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 6-0 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nara Vs Lukas Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nara are available here and Lukas photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
